Research tournaments are Tullock contests and hence WTA is optimal

A classic paper of “research tournaments” by Fullerton and McAfee (1999) assumes a single prize (by design). Hoppe-Wewetzer and Wagener (2019) show that a Fullerton–McAfee “research tournament” with multiple prizes is strategically equivalent to a (nested) multi-prize Tullock contest. Given that it is known that Tullock contests are strategically equivalent to “effort+noise” contests with Gumbel noise, the result of this paper implies that a single reward (winner-takes-all) is optimal for the Fullerton and McAfee (1999) model.

Hoppe-Wewetzer and Wagener, Multiple prizes in research tournaments, Economics Letters, 175:118-120, 2019.

Fullerton and McAfee, Auctioning Entry into TournamentsJournal of Political Economy, 107(573):581-82, 1999.

See also the related work:

Baye, M.R. and Hoppe, H.C. The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race gamesGames and economic behavior44(2), pp.217-226, 2003.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s